Estimated Time to Read: 8 minutes
In recent years, calls to eliminate property taxes have gained traction nationwide, driven by taxpayer frustrations, grassroots efforts, and shifting political priorities. North Dakota, in particular, is leading this charge with a historic vote that could abolish property taxes statewide—a bold proposal that has inspired similar movements in Michigan, Nebraska, and Texas. Each of these states faces the challenge of high property tax rates, impacting not only homeowners but also renters and local businesses.
Property tax elimination is no longer a fringe idea but a growing force that could reshape how states fund local services, how Americans experience property ownership, and revitalize conversations about what is deemed as necessary amounts of government spending.
Why Property Tax Elimination Has Gained Momentum
Property taxes are widely viewed as a regressive form of taxation, primarily because they don’t fluctuate with taxpayers’ ability to pay. Many Americans, especially homeowners, feel that property taxes create an undue burden, making homeownership feel less like a right and more like a lifelong lease from the government. For low-income households, retirees, and young families, rising property taxes can strain financial stability. These frustrations are evident in North Dakota, Michigan, and Nebraska, where grassroots advocacy and public pressure are pushing for tax reforms and, in some cases, outright elimination.
The Economic Appeal: Reducing Tax Burdens to Boost Competitiveness
For states, eliminating property taxes is about more than easing the financial load on residents; it’s also a way to enhance economic competitiveness. States with lower property taxes or alternative revenue systems can attract more businesses, foster job creation, and encourage population growth. A shift away from property taxes could also address housing affordability, as lower tax burdens may help reduce overall housing costs. In Texas, a state with a booming economy and reputation as a low-tax haven, addressing property taxes could solidify its appeal, attracting even more migration and business investment.
State-by-State Approaches to the Property Tax Debate
North Dakota: Leading the Charge with a Historic Vote on Property Tax Elimination
North Dakota has become the epicenter of property tax reform, with an upcoming vote on whether to abolish property taxes altogether. If successful, North Dakota would be the first state to eliminate property taxes entirely, potentially inspiring other states. Supporters argue that this move could revitalize homeownership, making it more affordable and secure. The initiative seeks to free homeowners from what advocates call an “endless lease” with the government. It should be noted that a similar effort overwhelmingly failed in 2012.
However, opponents fear that removing property taxes could destabilize funding for local services like schools, law enforcement, and infrastructure. With property taxes currently providing stable revenue, the state would need to shift to alternative sources, possibly raising sales taxes or using North Dakota’s substantial oil revenue. The vote represents a crucial moment for the national tax reform movement, and if passed, it could provide a roadmap for other states—including Texas—interested in similar reforms.
Michigan: Persistent Property Tax Reform Efforts Despite Setbacks
Michigan recently attempted to bring property tax elimination to the 2024 ballot but fell short due to insufficient signatures. This grassroots initiative reflected strong support for tax relief in a state where high property taxes are viewed as a barrier to homeownership and economic mobility. Supporters argue that Michigan’s property taxes disproportionately affect low- and middle-income households, making it harder for residents to purchase or retain homes as property values rise.
Despite the setback, Michigan’s property tax reform movement remains active. Advocates continue to pressure state lawmakers to reconsider the issue, keeping it at the forefront of public debate. This experience underscores the organizational and financial challenges inherent in ballot initiatives.
Nebraska: Struggling for Property Tax Relief Amid Legislative Hurdles
Nebraska’s path toward property tax relief illustrates the complexities of achieving substantial reform. High property taxes in Nebraska have spurred repeated calls for reform from both lawmakers and citizens. The push began with an ambitious proposal from the governor to provide substantial relief, offering caps on property taxes and additional state aid for local services. However, Nebraska’s initial reform plan met opposition in the legislature, where concerns over how to fund public services without property taxes slowed its momentum.
In addition to legislative efforts, the grassroots-led “Epic Option” sought to place property tax elimination directly on the ballot through a public petition. Despite robust support, the campaign ultimately failed to gather enough signatures to qualify, underscoring the difficulty of achieving such transformative change through direct voting. Following this setback, the Nebraska legislature passed a scaled-back relief package in August 2024, including modest expansions to the Property Tax Credit Relief Fund and agricultural exemptions. However, many Nebraskans felt the compromise fell short of providing meaningful relief.
Texas’ Complex Relationship with Property Taxes
Incremental Property Tax Relief: Why It’s Not Enough
Texas has made efforts to address property tax concerns, but critics, including us, argue these measures have been insufficient. As a state without an income tax, Texas relies heavily on property taxes to fund schools, emergency services, and infrastructure, creating a complex system that can burden homeowners. Rising property values in Texas amplify the impact, pushing tax bills higher even if rates remain steady. Recent property tax relief measures, while offering some respite, are often seen as temporary fixes that fail to address systemic issues.
With high property taxes disproportionately affecting low- and middle-income families, many argue that Texas needs a more transformative approach. The Texas Legislature has looked at property tax reductions, but they have not gone as far as to consider outright elimination. Legislation seeking to do as much has consistently been stifled within the legislative process. Unlike North Dakota’s bold proposal, Texas’s measures remain incremental, potentially leaving residents struggling under the weight of growing tax bills.
Could Texas Follow North Dakota’s Example?
North Dakota’s proposal to eliminate property taxes represents a potentially transformative model for Texas, though it would face unique challenges. Shifting away from property taxes in Texas would necessitate alternative revenue sources, given the state’s heavy reliance on these taxes for funding local schools and public services. Texas could explore options like a consumption-based tax model, which some argue could provide a more predictable revenue stream and reduce the tax burden on property owners. However, such a shift would require careful planning, likely requiring adjustments to sales or other taxes to cover funding gaps.
Texas’ path to meaningful tax reform might require boldness on par with North Dakota’s approach. A well-structured reform could not only ease the burden on property owners but also strengthen Texas’ business-friendly reputation, drawing increased investment and attracting residents from high-tax states like California and New York. Achieving this vision would require serious commitment from state and local policymakers to evaluate ongoing government spending and reassess the necessity of current programs. However, to date, lawmakers have largely avoided making substantial cuts.
Property Tax Elimination as a Political Force
The push to eliminate property taxes has evolved into a powerful political issue. As seen in Montana’s gubernatorial debates, candidates increasingly address tax policy to attract voters concerned about housing costs, inflation, and economic freedom. Taxpayer-driven initiatives, coupled with rising frustrations over property taxes, are pressuring state lawmakers to pursue reform. For Texas, the issue may grow more pressing as more citizens voice concerns over rising property values and increasing tax burdens in spite of purported tax relief.
Conclusion: Will Texas Answer the Call for Property Tax Reform?
As more states debate bold approaches to property tax reform, Texas finds itself at a crossroads. The incremental measures enacted thus far have not addressed the underlying issues that burden homeowners, weaken property rights, and exacerbate housing affordability challenges. By looking at the experiences of North Dakota, Michigan, and Nebraska, Texas has the opportunity to learn from both successes and setbacks in crafting its own approach to reform.
If Texas joins the property tax reform movement, it could lift a significant burden off homeowners while boosting its appeal as a prime location for businesses and residents alike. However, making this a reality will demand both political resolve and a well-crafted strategy to either replace lost revenue—ensuring essential public services stay funded without shifting costs to residents—or to make spending cuts where necessary.
If Texas can meet these challenges, it might become a leader in the growing tax revolt reshaping homeownership and economic policy across the United States. The question remains: will Texas seize this opportunity or maintain the status quo, risking the possibility of being left behind in the property tax reform revolution?
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
