The fiscal implications of SB 284 are minimal, according to the Legislative Budget Board (LBB). The bill does not anticipate any significant financial impact on the state government, as any costs associated with enforcing the new civil penalties can be absorbed within existing resources. This suggests that no additional appropriations or staffing increases would be required at the state level to implement the bill.
Similarly, local governments are not expected to experience any significant fiscal burden. While municipalities, counties, and district attorneys will have the authority to sue violators to collect penalties, the costs of enforcement and litigation are assumed to be manageable within their current budgets. Moreover, potential revenue increases from collected fines are not projected to be substantial enough to impact local budgets significantly.
In summary, SB 284's fiscal impact is expected to be neutral, with no major costs imposed on the state or local governments. The bill primarily strengthens enforcement mechanisms without requiring new financial resources for implementation.
SB 284 aims to strengthen enforcement against unauthorized commercial signage on public road right-of-ways by increasing civil penalties and expanding liability to businesses advertised on such signs. The bill addresses a persistent issue where violators either deny responsibility or treat fines as a minor cost of doing business. By increasing penalties and broadening liability, SB 284 seeks to create a stronger deterrent against illegal signage that can clutter public spaces and diminish neighborhood aesthetics.
However, while the bill reinforces private property rights and limited government in managing public spaces, it raises concerns regarding individual liberty and free enterprise. The expanded definition of "person" includes employees, agents, and contractors, which could unfairly penalize individuals with limited control over advertising decisions. Additionally, the removal of penalty discretion and daily violation accrual may disproportionately impact small businesses, particularly those unaware of third-party advertising practices.
Given these concerns, an amendment is necessary to clarify liability, ensuring penalties target only those who knowingly authorize sign placement rather than employees or contractors acting under direction. A graduated warning system for first-time offenders could also balance enforcement with fairness. With these revisions, the bill would better align with principles of individual responsibility, free enterprise, and limited government. Therefore, Texas Policy Research recommends that lawmakers vote NO on SB 284 unless amended as described above.