According to the Legislative Budget Board's (LBB) fiscal note, SB 616 is not expected to have a significant fiscal impact on the state government. The bill primarily grants the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) the authority to permit aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) projects that transect the Edwards Aquifer in Williamson County. Any costs associated with implementing the bill, such as drafting new regulations or overseeing ASR projects, are anticipated to be absorbed within existing agency resources, meaning no additional funding or staffing allocations are required.

For local governments, no significant fiscal impact is anticipated. This suggests that municipalities, counties, and local water management districts will not face major cost burdens due to the implementation of the bill. However, indirect costs or benefits may emerge depending on the scale of ASR projects developed under this new regulatory framework. If ASR projects enhance water availability, they could lead to long-term cost savings for local water utilities and consumers. Conversely, some local administrative costs may increase if additional environmental oversight is required.

Overall, SB 616 is fiscally neutral and does not impose significant financial obligations on the state or local governments. However, the long-term economic and infrastructure benefits of improved water storage capacity could be substantial, especially for areas experiencing water scarcity challenges.

SB 616 proposes an amendment to the Texas Water Code to authorize aquifer storage and recovery (ASR) projects that transect the Edwards Aquifer in Williamson County. The bill aims to improve groundwater management and water conservation by allowing controlled injection of water into a geologic formation beneath the aquifer. Supporters argue that ASR projects provide a critical tool for managing Texas' water resources, particularly in areas prone to drought. Opponents, however, may raise concerns about potential impacts on private property rights, regulatory oversight, and environmental risks.

From a neutral perspective, the bill presents both potential benefits and risks. Proponents highlight that ASR technology could enhance water availability, benefit agricultural and municipal users, and improve drought resilience without the need for large surface reservoirs. Critics may worry about unintended consequences, such as changes to groundwater flow, risks of contamination, or increased government oversight that could affect private well owners. Additionally, while the Texas Commission on Environmental Quality (TCEQ) is directed to establish rules by 2026, the bill does not specify detailed safeguards or notification requirements for affected landowners.

Given these balanced considerations, the bill does not clearly warrant a strong endorsement or opposition. Stakeholders, including local governments, property owners, and water authorities, should assess the specific impacts of ASR projects in Williamson County before finalizing a stance. Future amendments or agency rulemaking may help clarify how private property concerns, environmental protections, and implementation costs will be addressed, making this an issue to watch as it progresses through the legislative process.

• HB 1618 (Same As)