Since SCR 9 is a resolution rather than a statutory bill, it does not impose any direct fiscal obligations on the State of Texas. The resolution merely expresses the state's official position urging the U.S. Congress to propose a constitutional amendment. It does not create new programs, require additional state funding, or change Texas laws.

SCR 9 is a resolution urging the U.S. Congress to propose and submit for ratification the "Keep Nine" amendment, which would permanently fix the number of U.S. Supreme Court justices at nine. The resolution is based on the principle that an independent judiciary is essential to maintaining the constitutional system of checks and balances. By preventing court-packing efforts that could be used to shift the balance of power for political advantage, SCR 9 seeks to uphold judicial independence and protect the long-standing structure of the Supreme Court.

From a policy standpoint, SCR 9 aligns with key liberty principles, including Limited Government, Individual Liberty, and Private Property Rights. Preventing the expansion of the Supreme Court ensures that political majorities cannot manipulate the judiciary to advance partisan agendas, thereby preserving the court’s role as an impartial arbiter of constitutional rights. A stable and independent judiciary is critical to protecting private property rights and individual freedoms from government overreach. Additionally, limiting the ability to alter the number of justices maintains the integrity of judicial decision-making and prevents unnecessary legal uncertainty.

The fiscal impact of this resolution on Texas is minimal to none, as it is a symbolic policy statement rather than a statutory change. Any administrative costs related to forwarding copies of the resolution to federal officials are negligible. However, at the national level, maintaining the current Supreme Court structure could prevent future taxpayer expenses associated with judicial expansion, such as increased salaries, staff, and security for additional justices. Given its strong alignment with principles of limited government and judicial stability, Texas Policy Research recommends a YES vote for SCR 9.

• HCR 33 (Same As)