Estimated Time to Read: 8 minutes
In mid-August 2024, Texas unveiled its first-ever comprehensive State Flood Plan, which many see as a critical step toward managing the state’s growing flood risks. The plan, led by the Texas Water Development Board (TWDB), aims to mitigate both current and future flooding threats by integrating data-driven solutions tailored to Texas’ diverse geographic regions. It ultimately aims to provide a blueprint for how the state can protect its people, property, and infrastructure while also attempting to prepare for a future in which floods are expected to become more frequent and severe.
The document, comprised of two volumes (Volume I: 2024 State Flood Plan, Appendix A, Appendix C and Volume II: Appendix B – Ranked List of Recommended Flood Risk Reduction Solutions) includes policy recommendations, existing flood mitigation infrastructure, and ongoing projects, at-risk areas, goals, and recommended flood risk reduction solutions, as well as the estimated cost for those solutions going forward. Those costs are staggering.
A Comprehensive ‘Watershed-Based’ Approach
The 2024 State Flood Plan adopts a ‘watershed-based’ framework to address the unique needs of Texas’ 15 flood planning regions. This regional approach reflects the state’s geographical diversity, recognizing that flood mitigation strategies must vary depending on the landscape, climate, and infrastructure of each area. Texas has a long history of devastating floods, and this plan attempted to acknowledge the importance of local expertise in crafting effective solutions.
The State Flood Plan, the first of its kind in Texas history, represents an unprecedented assessment of Texas’ flood risks, covering both urban centers and rural areas. It includes a thorough analysis of each region’s vulnerability to flood events like 100-year and 500-year floods, which put millions of people at risk. As an example, urban areas such as Houston are particularly vulnerable to flash flooding, while rural regions like East Texas face unique challenges from river overflows.
At the heart of the plan seems to be a focus on reducing existing risks and preventing future ones. Over 4,000 flood mitigation projects have been proposed as part of the overall plan, including both structural and non-structural solutions. These projects include traditional methods like levees and detention basins, alongside modern innovations like nature-based solutions and floodplain buyouts.
Regional Collaboration and Tailored Solutions
One of the standout aspects of the State Flood Plan is the collaboration between local governments, regional flood planning groups, and the TWDB. This “bottom-up” planning process seems to be an attempt to ensure that the solutions proposed are highly targeted to the specific risks faced by each region. For instance, in East Texas, the focus is on restoring wetlands to absorb floodwaters, while areas around Houston are exploring deep tunnel systems to manage stormwater runoff.
Regional flood planning groups held over 550 public meetings and gathered input from ‘stakeholders’ across the state in an effort to have transparent planning processes and to ensure that local communities had a say in how their flood risks would be mitigated.
As an example of a tailored solution, in the city of Houston, one of the most flood-prone areas of the state, plans are being developed to build a massive deep tunnel system to carry stormwater away from flood-prone neighborhoods. Such projects are deemed essential in areas where existing infrastructure cannot handle the volume of water that frequent storms bring.
Flood Mitigation Projects
The 2024 flood plan lays out thousands of flood mitigation projects across the state. These projects range from upgrading drainage systems to prevent urban flooding to restoring natural floodplains in rural areas. Many of the recommended projects focus on addressing the areas most vulnerable to catastrophic flood events. In East Texas, efforts include restoring critical wetlands that act as natural flood barriers, while regions like Harris County are working on large-scale infrastructure upgrades.
Houston’s aforementioned deep tunnel stormwater management system proposal is an example of a large-scale structural solution. The estimated costs for this type of project are enormous, but the potential to prevent billions in flood damage is seen as justification for the investment. Additionally, ongoing projects to improve dam safety across Texas are an attempt to ensure that the state’s aging infrastructure is up to the challenge of managing increasing rainfall and runoff.
Non-structural solutions are deemed equally important. Floodplain mapping updates, stricter zoning regulations, and buyouts of properties in high-risk areas all seem to play vital roles in reducing flood risk, such as restoring wetlands and forests to absorb excess water—which are deemed critical for both flood control and environmental preservation. These strategies are efforts to reduce flood risk while offering long-term environmental and economic benefits.
Costs and Funding
Implementing the 2024 Texas State Flood Plan will require a significant financial investment, with estimates reaching upwards of $50 billion to complete all proposed projects. While the TWDB has already committed over $643 million to flood-related initiatives since the Flood Infrastructure Fund (FIF) was established in 2019, they also recommended that state lawmakers allocate substantially more funding for these critical projects, far surpassing the $1.4 billion added to the FIF since its inception. For context, Texas’ total budget for the 2024-25 biennium is $321.7 billion, as appropriated during the 88th Legislative Session. Fully funding the flood plan would consume more than 15% of the state’s budget—compared to the less than 0.5% currently allocated for flood prevention.
The plan underscores the need for multiple funding sources, including state-backed loans, federal grants, and local investments (all taxpayer money of course). Additionally, many rural areas—where local governments may lack the resources (i.e. tax base) of larger cities—require tailored financial assistance to ensure they are not left behind. This is deemed especially important as rural infrastructure is often less equipped to handle extreme weather events, leaving these areas more vulnerable.
Some argue that the requested investment in flood mitigation is minimal compared to the staggering costs of flood-related disasters. Take Hurricane Harvey as an example: this Category 4 storm dropped over 50 inches of rain in parts of Houston and lingered over the city for days. The damage caused by Harvey reached nearly $125 billion, far surpassing the cost of proactive flood prevention measures. Investing now could prevent similar catastrophic losses in the future.
Policy Recommendations and Long-Term Solutions
The TWDB’s policy recommendations in the 2024 plan go beyond physical infrastructure. To effectively manage flood risk, they indicate that the state must adopt more stringent floodplain management policies that limit development in flood-prone areas. The plan suggests updating stormwater design standards and encourages local governments to adopt higher standards for building in flood zones.
Public engagement is also seen as critical to the plan’s success. Educating Texans about flood risks and ensuring they are prepared for future flood events is seen as key to minimizing the loss of life and property. This involves not only better public outreach but also fostering a culture of flood preparedness. It is suggested that public awareness campaigns and updated floodplain maps can help residents understand their risks and take proactive steps to protect themselves.
Challenges Facing Flood Management in Texas
Despite the thoroughness of the plan, several challenges remain. One of the most significant is uncertainty surrounding future flood risks, as a changing climate makes floods more frequent and severe. Texas’ infrastructure is not designed to handle the increased rainfall expected in the coming decades. While the plan addresses current vulnerabilities, it also calls for ongoing adaptation as new climate data becomes available.
Funding will continue to be a critical challenge. While the Flood Infrastructure Fund and other sources offer essential support, the scale of the projects ahead means Texas—and likely state lawmakers—will need to explore additional financing options. Small and rural communities face particularly steep hurdles, as they often lack the financial and technical resources to execute large-scale flood mitigation efforts. Expanding funding opportunities will be key to ensuring these areas are not left vulnerable.
Conclusion
The 2024 Texas State Flood Plan represents a critical milestone in the state’s efforts to protect its residents from the devastating impacts of floods. With thousands of projects proposed, from large-scale infrastructure improvements to nature-based solutions, the plan offers a comprehensive approach to managing flood risks now and in the future. However, significant challenges remain, particularly in securing the necessary funding for all of the recommended projects.
The 2024 State Flood Plan offers a clear roadmap for flood mitigation, but whether Texas elected officials will fully embrace and implement the recommendations remains to be seen.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
