Estimated Time to Read: 8 minutes
Texas has long been regarded as a pro-business state, attracting corporations and workers with its low taxes, relatively light regulatory framework, and strategic geographic location. The Bigger. Better. Texas. economic development strategic plan for 2025-2029 sets out a framework to maintain and expand that economic position. Developed by the Texas Economic Development & Tourism Office under the Governor’s direction, the plan prioritizes business expansion, innovation, workforce development, and infrastructure investment. The state presents this as a roadmap for maintaining Texas’ economic strength, but questions remain about the necessity of government involvement in economic development and whether this type of planning is effective or even appropriate.
Assessing Texas’ Economic Positions and Challenges
Texas has consistently ranked as one of the strongest economies in the United States, with a GDP that surpasses most countries and a labor force that continues to grow. Its industries range from oil and gas, which has historically driven much of the state’s wealth, to a growing presence in semiconductors, biotechnology, and aerospace. However, as more businesses relocate to Texas and its population grows, the state faces infrastructure strain, rising housing costs, and increasing concerns about whether its workforce is prepared for the demands of evolving industries.
The Bigger. Better. Texas. plan acknowledges these concerns, proposing various state-led initiatives to address them. The assumption underlying this strategy is that the government should play a role in facilitating economic growth rather than simply letting market forces dictate Texas’ future. Critics argue that while addressing infrastructure and workforce training are reasonable priorities, direct involvement in business attraction and industry development risks overstepping the bounds of limited government.
The State’s Role in Business and Industry Expansion
One of the plan’s core objectives is to maintain Texas’ reputation as a business-friendly state. This includes sustaining low taxes while also providing targeted support for industries deemed essential for long-term economic success. The state identifies key sectors such as semiconductor manufacturing, artificial intelligence, and renewable energy as priorities for investment and incentives.
While Texas has a long history of economic growth without direct state intervention in industry development, the plan suggests an increasing reliance on state-directed economic policy. Supporters argue that targeted incentives and infrastructure investments are necessary to attract businesses in highly competitive industries. However, others see this as the government attempting to “pick winners and losers,” potentially distorting markets and creating artificial advantages for some industries at the expense of others.
Texas’ approach to international trade is also a focal point of the plan. As the top exporting state in the U.S., Texas benefits significantly from global commerce. The strategic plan emphasizes the need to strengthen international partnerships and invest in infrastructure that supports trade, such as expanding port capacity and improving transportation networks. While this aligns with a free-market approach to economic growth, some question whether state-led initiatives in trade promotion are necessary, given that businesses operating in Texas already have a strong presence in global markets.
Innovation and Entrepreneurship: Should the State Be Involved?
Texas has long positioned itself as a state where entrepreneurs can succeed with minimal government interference. The Bigger. Better. Texas. plan, however, outlines a more active role for the state in fostering innovation, particularly through increased funding for research and development, venture capital incentives, and public-private partnerships.
The justification for this involvement is that innovation-driven industries, such as semiconductors and artificial intelligence, require significant upfront investment and long-term planning that may not be feasible without state support. However, critics argue that the private sector is already well-equipped to handle these developments without government intervention. There is also concern that state-directed funding and incentives could favor politically popular industries while neglecting other sectors that might emerge naturally through market forces.
The plan also includes measures to support small businesses and startups, such as expanding access to funding and simplifying regulatory processes. While reducing bureaucratic obstacles may be widely supported, the question remains whether direct state involvement in entrepreneurship is necessary or if Texas’ historically hands-off approach has already proven to be the best model for fostering business growth.
Before you read the rest of this article, we’d like to remind you that TPR’s important work is only possible because of the generosity of liberty-minded Texans just like you. Every gift helps empower the public and policymakers with access to reliable analysis like the content you are reading right now. Please consider donating today to support our legislative research efforts if you find this information helpful. Thanks, now let’s get back to the research.
Workforce Development: Addressing Skills Gaps or Creating Bureacracy?
One of the most significant challenges Texas faces is ensuring that its workforce keeps pace with industry demands. The strategic plan highlights the need for expanded technical training programs, increased apprenticeship opportunities, and stronger ties between businesses and educational institutions.
Texas has a growing population and one of the fastest-expanding labor markets in the country, but ensuring that workers are trained for high-demand industries is a persistent challenge. The plan proposes aligning workforce training initiatives with employer needs, a goal that seems practical but raises questions about government involvement in shaping labor markets. Skeptics argue that businesses themselves are best suited to determine workforce needs and that government-led training programs can be inefficient, costly, and disconnected from actual market demands.
While some aspects of the workforce strategy, such as strengthening partnerships between employers and schools, may be beneficial, others—such as state-directed job training initiatives—could create additional layers of bureaucracy without necessarily delivering better results. The effectiveness of government-led workforce programs is often debated, particularly when private-sector apprenticeship and vocational training options already exist.
Infrastructure Investment: A Necessary Role for the State?
Infrastructure is one area where even critics of government economic intervention acknowledge that the state has a role to play. Texas’ rapid population and business growth have placed significant pressure on its highways, energy grid, and broadband networks. The Bigger. Better. Texas. plan identifies infrastructure investment as a key priority, focusing on transportation, power grid reliability, and rural broadband expansion.
Texas has experienced major infrastructure challenges in recent years, particularly concerning its power grid’s ability to handle extreme weather events. The plan proposes measures to improve grid stability and expand renewable energy capacity. However, the extent to which government intervention is needed remains a point of debate. Some argue that the private sector, rather than the state, should take the lead in energy development, with government simply ensuring a stable regulatory environment.
Broadband expansion, particularly in rural areas, is another major initiative outlined in the plan. While improved internet access is generally seen as beneficial for economic development, questions remain about whether the government should be directly involved in broadband deployment or if private telecommunications companies should be responsible for expanding access.
The 89th Legislative Session and Governor Abbott’s 2025 State of the State Address
Governor Greg Abbott’s 2025 State of the State Address set the tone for the ongoing 89th Texas Legislative Session, outlining key priorities that align closely with the Bigger. Better. Texas. economic development plan. Abbott emphasized maintaining Texas’ competitive edge by focusing on tax relief, economic incentives, infrastructure development, and workforce training initiatives.
One of the major themes of Abbott’s address was ensuring that Texas remains the best state for business growth while reinforcing fiscal responsibility. He reaffirmed the need for tax relief measures to prevent rising property taxes from stifling business expansion and discussed targeted legislative efforts to remove regulatory barriers for businesses. Abbott also placed strong emphasis on public safety and border security, arguing that economic stability depends on a secure state.
However, the session is expected to include debates over government intervention in economic development, particularly regarding the effectiveness of incentive programs and state-led business recruitment efforts. Some lawmakers and policy analysts have raised concerns that corporate tax incentives and subsidies distort free markets and create long-term fiscal liabilities. Others argue that strategic investments in infrastructure and workforce development are necessary to sustain economic growth.
As the 89th Texas Legislature continues, the effectiveness of Abbott’s priorities will largely depend on legislative negotiations and whether lawmakers see government involvement in economic development as a necessary step or an overreach.
Looking Ahead
As Texas moves forward with implementing this economic development strategy, the impact of these initiatives will be closely watched. If the plan strengthens business growth, workforce readiness, and infrastructure without excessive government interference, it could reinforce Texas’ position as a leading economic powerhouse. However, if state involvement distorts market dynamics or proves inefficient, it may serve as evidence that economic development is best left to the private sector. Ultimately, the success or failure of Bigger. Better. Texas. will serve as a case study in the ongoing debate over the role of government in economic policy.
Texas Policy Research relies on the support of generous donors across Texas.
If you found this information helpful, please consider supporting our efforts! Thank you!
